|
Home
Welcome Discuss Latest News WWJDrive Tour - Press Room - Tour Journal - Tour In the News What you can do - Call to Action - Sign the Pledge - Student Pledge - Bumper Sticker Resources - Fact Sheets - Discussion Paper - For Churches - Creation Care Magazine About / Contact Support |
In the NewsSee also WWJDrive Tour news News Archives by Month:
Jul 2008 Jun 2008 | May 2008 Apr 2008 | Mar 2008 Feb 2008 | Jan 2008 Dec 2007 | Nov 2007 Oct 2007 | Sep 2007 Aug 2007 | Jul 2007 Jun 2007 | May 2007 Apr 2007 | Mar 2007 Feb 2007 | Jan 2007 Dec 2006 | Nov 2006 Oct 2006 | Sep 2006 Aug 2006 | Jul 2006 Jun 2006 | May 2006 Apr 2006 | Mar 2006 Feb 2006 | Jan 2006 Dec 2005 | Nov 2005 Oct 2005 | Sep 2005 Aug 2005 | Jul 2005 Jun 2005 | May 2005 Apr 2005 | Mar 2005 Feb 2005 | Jan 2005 Dec 2004 | Nov 2004 Oct 2004 | Sep 2004 Aug 2004 | Jul 2004 Jun 2004 | May 2004 Apr 2004 | Mar 2004 Feb 2004 | Jan 2004 Dec 2003 | Nov 2003 Oct 2003 | Sep 2003 Aug 2003 | Jul 2003 Jun 2003 | May 2003 Apr 2003 | Mar 2003 Feb 2003 | Jan 2003 Dec 2002 | Nov 2002 Tuesday, December 23 2003 9:27am EST
Proposed Changes in Fuel Economy Regulations Outlined
The Bush administration proposed to overhaul federal vehicle fuel economy regulations yesterday for the first time since they were created after the oil shocks of the 1970's.
But it is not clear to what extent, if at all, the proposals - which are aimed at sport utility vehicles, pickup trucks and minivans - would reduce gasoline consumption or save lives, two of the main stated goals of the program. The proposals, which appear in a report released by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, conform to earlier reports about the administration's plans on fuel economy, and the main tenets have been known since March. The proposed changes would break the light truck fleet into either weight or size classes instead of having a single fleetwide average for all light trucks; they also might regulate light trucks that weigh more than about 5,000 pounds more stringently. Much will depend on how many weight or size classes there are and how challenging the mileage targets are for each class. The report conceded that such a plan would not necessarily improve fuel economy. "It is theoretically possible the overall fuel economy of the fleet would not increase significantly or might even decline," the report said. But the proposal would bring the largest sport utilities, those over roughly 6,000 pounds unloaded, into the regulatory system for the first time. For the full article go to: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/23/business/23fuel.html News Archives by Month:
Jul 2008 Jun 2008 | May 2008 Apr 2008 | Mar 2008 Feb 2008 | Jan 2008 Dec 2007 | Nov 2007 Oct 2007 | Sep 2007 Aug 2007 | Jul 2007 Jun 2007 | May 2007 Apr 2007 | Mar 2007 Feb 2007 | Jan 2007 Dec 2006 | Nov 2006 Oct 2006 | Sep 2006 Aug 2006 | Jul 2006 Jun 2006 | May 2006 Apr 2006 | Mar 2006 Feb 2006 | Jan 2006 Dec 2005 | Nov 2005 Oct 2005 | Sep 2005 Aug 2005 | Jul 2005 Jun 2005 | May 2005 Apr 2005 | Mar 2005 Feb 2005 | Jan 2005 Dec 2004 | Nov 2004 Oct 2004 | Sep 2004 Aug 2004 | Jul 2004 Jun 2004 | May 2004 Apr 2004 | Mar 2004 Feb 2004 | Jan 2004 Dec 2003 | Nov 2003 Oct 2003 | Sep 2003 Aug 2003 | Jul 2003 Jun 2003 | May 2003 Apr 2003 | Mar 2003 Feb 2003 | Jan 2003 Dec 2002 | Nov 2002 |
|
Site developed by Guided Vision |