A Discussion Initiated by the Evangelical Environmental Network & Creation Care Magazine
because transportation is a moral issue

Home
Welcome
Discuss
Latest News
WWJDrive Tour
- Press Room
- Tour Journal
- Tour In the News
What you can do
- Call to Action
- Sign the Pledge
- Student Pledge
- Bumper Sticker
Resources
- Fact Sheets
- Discussion Paper
- For Churches
- Creation Care Magazine
About / Contact
Support



 

In the News

See also WWJDrive Tour news

Friday, April 30 2004 11:25am EDT
by Miguel Bustillo, LA Times
Supreme Court Curbs CA Attempts to Reduce Pollution
Published April 29, 2004


Southern California air quality officials overstepped their authority when they required private trash haulers, bus lines and other companies to purchase low-pollution vehicles for their fleets, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday.


The 8-1 decision significantly sets back a broad effort by the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the regional smog agency, to expand its reach and tackle the biggest sources of smog-forming exhaust: cars, trucks and other motor vehicles.


The federal government has primary authority over those pollution sources, and local regulators assert that federal officials are not doing enough to help clean the air in Southern California.


Because Southern California has the nation's worst pollution problem, regional smog officials — responsible for air quality in Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino counties — have long had the right to set tougher standards than the federal government for factories, power plants and other stationary sources of pollution.


But that authority does not help in handling emissions from cars, trucks and other vehicles, which account for about 70% of the region's smog.


To address that pollution, air quality regulators had argued that the federal Clean Air Act gave them the power to impose the anti-pollution requirements on fleets of vehicles. Because they were not regulating the manufacture of vehicles, just limiting the types that local fleet-owners could buy, the regulations did not overstep their power, the local regulators argued.


The Bush administration disagreed and sided with engine manufacturers and oil companies that sued the California regulators.


In the decision, eight of nine justices took the industry's side, saying Congress specifically sought to keep local officials from taking such measures when it debated the Clean Air Act.

"The manufacturer's right to sell federally approved vehicles is meaningless in the absence of a purchaser's right to buy them," Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in the court's opinion.


"If one state or political subdivision may enact such rules, then so may any other; and the end result would undo Congress' carefully calibrated regulatory scheme," he added.


Since their adoption in 2000 and 2001, the rules have put more than 8,900 low-polluting trash trucks, transit buses, airport shuttles and passenger cars on Southern California roads, AQMD officials said.


More than 60% of the region's transit buses are running on cleaner alternative fuels, such as natural gas. By 2010, the rules were projected to erase 4,780 tons per year of polluting emissions, including 2,699 tons of carbon monoxide and 1,931 tons of nitrogen oxides, key component of smog.


The ruling comes at a time when Southern California smog fighters are losing ground in their battle to clean the air after decades of gains.


Last year, the area experienced 68 bad air days, a 28% increase from the previous year and nearly 50% more than in 2001. Last summer, air quality officials declared the first Stage 1 health alert since 1998. The public warning that the air was dangerous for everyone to breathe was one officials had thought they might never need to issue again.


"We're scrapping for every possible cost-effective pollution control strategy. Here is an example of a metropolitan area that is demonstrating leadership, and the rug is being pulled out from under them," said Bill Becker, executive director of the State and Territorial Air Pollution Program Administrators Assn. in Washington.


Regional regulators elsewhere in the country may now steer clear of innovative rules for dealing with air pollution problems in their backyards, he said.


"There seems to be a pattern at the federal level of taking away regulatory tools that state and local regulatory agencies have to clean up the air," Becker said. "We expected the administration to at least remain neutral."


Bush administration officials have maintained that they were not attempting to undercut the state's power.

"The driving force here was a genuine fear that every county and local agency would come in with their own fleet rules and distort what should have been a uniform national marketplace," said attorney Carter G. Phillips, who argued the case on behalf of the Engine Manufacturers Assn. and the Western States Petroleum Assn.


For complete article, go to
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-me-smog29apr29,1,6862096.story

 

Home | Welcome | Discuss | Latest News | WWJDrive Tour | What you can do | Resources | About / Contact | Support
 

Site developed by Guided Vision